Current:Home > InvestVoting Rights Act weighs heavily in North Dakota’s attempt to revisit redistricting decision it won -Nova Finance Academy
Voting Rights Act weighs heavily in North Dakota’s attempt to revisit redistricting decision it won
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:00:16
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Months after it won a lawsuit over legislative boundaries, North Dakota is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its victory, baffling others involved in the state’s redistricting fights and prompting some legal experts to call the state’s action a potential assault on the Voting Rights Act.
At issue is a ruling by a federal panel over a lawsuit filed by Republicans challenging the constitutionality of a redistricting map that created House subdistricts encompassing two American Indian reservations. Proponents of the subdistricts said they gave tribal nations better chances to elect their own members. Last fall, a federal three-judge panel tossed out the lawsuit at the request of the state and the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation. The judges wrote that “assuming without deciding” that race was the main factor for the subdistricts, “the State had good reasons and strong evidence to believe the subdistricts were required by the VRA.”
The plaintiffs appealed.
North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley said the three-judge panel decided the matter correctly under existing case law — but for the wrong reason. The state argues in a filing made Monday that it “cannot defend this Court’s ‘assumption’ that attempted compliance with the VRA (or any statute) would justify racial discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
“We’re not seeking to reverse” the panel’s decision, Wrigley said. “We’re seeking to have it upheld but for the reason that race was not the predominant factor, and we think that we should prevail.”
But critics bashed the move as a questionable legal maneuver as well as an attempt to assault the Voting Rights Act.
“Imagine if you hired a lawyer, and that lawyer won the case for you, and then the other side appealed, and on appeal your lawyer argued that the judgment in your favor should be vacated and the matter should be sent back for a trial so that your lawyer could make some different arguments. Imagine that. I think in that scenario, you’d probably want your money back from your lawyer,” said Tim Purdon, who represents the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in their separate, successful lawsuit for a joint legislative district.
David Schultz, a Hamline University professor and a visiting professor of law at the University of Minnesota, said he thinks the action is part of a broader assault on the Voting Rights Act “to say that racial considerations cannot be used for any circumstances” when district lines are drawn.
Meanwhile, more than a dozen Republican-led states — most of which have engaged in legal fights over election maps — want the decision reversed. Last month, Alabama’s attorney general and the other states filed their brief with the court, saying they “have an interest in being able to accurately predict whether their redistricting laws will comply with federal law.”
Schultz also said he thinks the states see an opportunity now that the U.S. Supreme Court has a conservative majority.
Kareem Crayton, senior director of voting rights and representation at the Brennan Center for Justice, said, “This is sort of, to my mind, a question as to whether or not states are really learning the lessons that the Voting Rights Act was intended to help them embrace, which is you’ve got to treat communities of color as everyone else. They’re entitled to an opportunity to elect candidates.”
Key in the North Dakota case is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which forbids discriminatory voting practices based on race or color. Crayton said “these continued assaults on it raise questions as to whether or not these states actually want any fair consideration of election systems for people of color who are citizens of their states.”
In a statement, MHA Nation Tribal Chairman Mark Fox called it “extremely disappointing” to see Wrigley’s office now arguing “for this winning judgment to be vacated and this matter sent back down for a trial. We opposed this unconscionable change of position when the Attorney General raised it with us, and we oppose it now.”
Plaintiff attorney Bob Harms welcomed the state’s filing.
“I know the attorney general’s getting some criticism from people who feel like they won at the district level, but I do think that we have to step above that, about not just winning and losing but looking at constitutional principles and how they’re applied,” he said.
Wrigley said the Supreme Court will decide whether to have oral arguments and further briefing.
veryGood! (82876)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Mega Millions jackpot approaching $900 million: What to know about the next lottery drawing
- Experimental plane crashes in Arizona, killing 1 and seriously injuring another
- R. Kelly seeks appeals court relief from 30-year prison term
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Love Is Blind's Chelsea and Jimmy Reunite Again in Playful Video
- Power ranking all 68 teams in the 2024 NCAA Tournament bracket based on March Madness odds
- Best Micellar Water for Removing Your Makeup and Cleansing Your Face
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- 'My body won't cooperate any longer': Ex-Cowboys LB Leighton Vander Esch retires from NFL
Ranking
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Man seeks clemency to avoid what could be Georgia’s first execution in more than 4 years
- Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents
- Love Is Blind's Chelsea and Jimmy Reunite Again in Playful Video
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Protecting abortion rights in states hangs in the balance of national election strategies
- Caitlin Clark and Iowa get no favors in NCAA Tournament bracket despite No. 1 seed
- Haiti's long history of crises, and its present unrest
Recommendation
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Garrison Brown’s Close Friend Calls for Sister Wives To Be Canceled After His Death
Announcers revealed for NCAA Tournament men's first round
Country Music Hall of Fame: Toby Keith, James Burton, John Anderson are the 2024 inductees
Could your smelly farts help science?
Why Bella Hadid's Morning Wellness Routine Is Raising Eyebrows
Horoscopes Today, March 17, 2024
Wayne Simmonds retires: Former Flyers star was NHL All-Star Game MVP