Current:Home > ContactCourt revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times -Nova Finance Academy
Court revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:15:45
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court revived Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times on Wednesday, citing errors by a lower court judge, particularly his decision to dismiss the lawsuit while a jury was deliberating.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan wrote that Judge Jed S. Rakoff’s decision in February 2022 to dismiss the lawsuit mid-deliberations improperly intruded on the jury’s work.
It also found that the erroneous exclusion of evidence, an inaccurate jury instruction and an erroneous response to a question from the jury tainted the jury’s decision to rule against Palin. It declined, however, to grant Palin’s request to force Rakoff off the case on grounds he was biased against her. The 2nd Circuit said she had offered no proof.
The libel lawsuit by Palin, a onetime Republican vice presidential candidate and former governor of Alaska, centered on the newspaper’s 2017 editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting, which Palin asserted damaged her reputation and career.
The Times acknowledged its editorial was inaccurate but said it quickly corrected errors it called an “honest mistake” that were never meant to harm Palin.
Shane Vogt, a lawyer for Palin, said he was reviewing the opinion.
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for the Times, said the decision was disappointing. “We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial,” he said in an email.
The 2nd Circuit, in a ruling written by Judge John M. Walker Jr., reversed the jury verdict, along with Rakoff’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit while jurors were deliberating.
Despite his ruling, Rakoff let jurors finish deliberating and render their verdict, which went against Palin.
The appeals court noted that Rakoff’s ruling made credibility determinations, weighed evidence, and ignored facts or inferences that a reasonable juror could plausibly find supported Palin’s case.
It also described how “push notifications” that reached the cellphones of jurors “came as an unfortunate surprise to the district judge.” The 2nd Circuit said it was not enough that the judge’s law clerk was assured by jurors that Rakoff’s ruling had not affected their deliberations.
“Given a judge’s special position of influence with a jury, we think a jury’s verdict reached with the knowledge of the judge’s already-announced disposition of the case will rarely be untainted, no matter what the jurors say upon subsequent inquiry,” the appeals court said.
In its ruling Wednesday, the 2nd Circuit said it was granting a new trial because of various trial errors and because Rakoff’s mid-deliberations ruling against Palin, which might have reached jurors through alerts delivered to cell phones, “impugn the reliability of that verdict.”
“The jury is sacrosanct in our legal system, and we have a duty to protect its constitutional role, both by ensuring that the jury’s role is not usurped by judges and by making certain that juries are provided with relevant proffered evidence and properly instructed on the law,” the appeals court said.
veryGood! (37)
Related
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Diana Taurasi on Caitlin Clark's learning curve: 'A different dance you have to learn'
- Uvalde mass shooting survivors, victims' families sue UPS and FedEx
- US gas prices are falling. Experts point to mild demand at the pump ahead of summer travel
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Heat stress can turn deadly even sooner than experts thought. Are new warnings needed?
- Judge agrees to let George Santos summer in the Poconos while criminal case looms
- Radio host Dan Patrick: 'I don't think Caitlin Clark is one of the 12 best players right now'
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- NBA mock draft: Zaccharie Risacher and Alex Sarr remain 1-2; Reed Sheppard climbing
Ranking
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- An Oregon man was stranded after he plummeted off an embankment. His dog ran 4 miles to get help.
- Defense attorney for rapper Young Thug found in contempt, ordered to spend 10 weekends in jail
- Invasive furry-clawed crabs that terrorize fishermen have been found in New York
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Prison inmate accused of selling ghost guns through site visited by Buffalo supermarket shooter
- Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp journeys to South Korea in sixth overseas trip
- Dutch king and queen visit Georgia’s oldest city and trade powerhouse during US visit
Recommendation
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
FDA issues warning about paralytic shellfish poisoning. Here's what to know.
Caitlin Clark is not an alternate on US Olympic basketball team, but there's a reason
Defense attorney for rapper Young Thug found in contempt, ordered to spend 10 weekends in jail
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Prosecutors' star witness faces cross-examination in Sen. Bob Menendez bribery trial
Why It Girls Get Their Engagement Rings From Frank Darling
Defense attorney for rapper Young Thug found in contempt, ordered to spend 10 weekends in jail