Current:Home > NewsGOP and Democratic Platforms Highlight Stark Differences on Energy and Climate -Nova Finance Academy
GOP and Democratic Platforms Highlight Stark Differences on Energy and Climate
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:58:38
If there was any lingering confusion on how America’s two major political parties differ over climate and energy policy, platforms released by the Republican and Democratic Parties during this month’s national conventions made their often polar-opposite views exceedingly clear.
Republicans would dismantle the Environmental Protection Agency as it currently exists and abolish the Clean Power Plan, the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s plan to rein in greenhouse gas emissions.
Democrats called for a price on carbon, implementation of the Clean Power Plan, which was stayed by the Supreme Court in February, as well as other regulatory measures to reduce greenhouse gases, and prioritization of renewable energy over natural gas.
While platforms are more outline of party beliefs than binding policy, they nonetheless offer a picture of the widening gulf between the increasingly conservative Republican Party and a Democratic Party that has adopted many of the progressive policies championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The two parties’ platforms take starkly different positions on education, immigration, health care and criminal justice, though their opposing worldviews are most plainly seen in their thinking on energy and climate.
The GOP platform states “coal is an abundant, clean, affordable, reliable domestic energy resource” and questions the scientific integrity of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the global authority on climate science. Democrats say climate change is an “urgent threat” and call for an 80 percent cut in carbon emissions.
Republicans would finish construction of the Keystone pipeline which would carry tar sands oil from Canada to Gulf Coast refineries and was rejected over climate concerns by the Obama administration. Democrats continue to oppose Keystone and call for a similar climate change litmus test for all future federal decisions so that they “contribute to solving, not significantly exacerbating climate change.”
“It looks like two different worlds,” said Daniel Fiorino, director of the American University School of Public Affairs’ Center for Environmental Policy. “When I started studying political science a frequent observation was ‘there is really not that much difference between the parties in the United States, it’s tweedle dee and tweedle dum.’ That’s no longer the case and it’s very apparent in their positions on environmental issues.”
Another stark difference is support for the Paris climate accord, an international agreement adopted by 195 countries which aims to keep global temperature increases to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius, something the Republican Party platform flatly rejects.
“If we just unilaterally pulled out of this agreement that we played such a significant role in helping to create, this would make it very difficult for any president to exercise their foreign policy agenda,” said Andrew Light, director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University and a former climate official in the Obama administration. Democrats “take it as assumed that we would continue to work with other countries to do this because that is the only way of solving the problem.”
What role party platforms play in shaping policy, however, is up for debate.
“It’s an opportunity for a presidential campaign to satisfy some of the activists in the party by giving them the opportunity to shape the platform to their liking, but it does not necessary mean that the presidential candidate or other candidates for office hold all of the positions included in the platform,” said David Hopkins, a political science professor at Boston College.
The Democratic Party platform, for example, includes a call to address the costs of carbon, while Clinton’s campaign has made it clear that a carbon tax is not part of her climate plan.
Candidates may also go further than what is called for in their party’s platform.
“If Trump wins I don’t think the Republican platform would have any tethering effect on the way he governs,” said David Victor, co-director of the Laboratory on International Law and Regulation at the University of California, San Diego. “I think he has a bunch of ideas about what to do that are actually bolder and more erratic than what’s reflected in the platform.“
A comprehensive analysis of Democratic and Republican Party platforms, however, shows that legislators closely adhere to those policy stances. Lee Payne, an associate professor at Stephen F. Austin State University analyzed every party platform from 1980 to 2004 and compared the policy positions to subsequent votes taken in the House and Senate. He found Democrats and Republicans voted in support of those positions 82 percent of the time.
“It does matter,” Payne said. “People get what they vote for.”
Glimpses of Trump’s energy and climate agenda were on view last week at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. “Every time we can’t drill a well in America, terrorism is being funded,” said Oklahoma oil and gas mogul Harold Hamm, who Trump is reportedly considering for his energy secretary.
While the Republican Party platform doesn’t call into question the science of climate change, Trump called it a “hoax” in 2012.
North Dakota Rep. Kevin Cramer, a Trump energy adviser, jokingly spoke in favor of climate change at an industry-sponsored event during the RNC hosted by Politico. “We’re for a warmer climate,” Cramer said.
veryGood! (54)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- See Khloe Kardashian's Adorable Photos of Daughter True Thompson on First Day of Kindergarten
- Bomb threat at Target in New Berlin was a hoax, authorities say
- Robert Downey Jr. Proves He Has Ironclad Bond With Wife Susan on 18th Anniversary
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- March on Washington organizer remembers historic moment as country pushes for change
- Is Rite Aid at risk of bankruptcy? What a Chapter 11 filing would mean for shoppers.
- Grad student charged with murder in shooting of University of North Carolina faculty member
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Nothing had been done like that before: Civil rights icon Dr. Josie Johnson on 60 years since March on Washington
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- 6 regions targeted in biggest drone attack on Russia since it sent troops to Ukraine, officials say
- High school football coach arrested, charged with battery after hitting player on sideline
- Educators say they are working with, not against, AI in the classroom
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- 'I find it wrong': Cosmetics brand ends Alice Cooper collection after he called trans people a 'fad'
- Generators can be deadly during hurricanes. Here's what to know about using them safely.
- Meg Ryan Returns to Rom-Coms After 14 Years: Watch the First Look at What Happens Later
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Denver City Council settles Black Lives Matter lawsuit for $4.72 million
Michael Oher Subpoenas Tuohys' Agents and The Blind Side Filmmakers in Legal Case
Hollywood’s working class turns to nonprofit funds to make ends meet during the strike
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Yes, people often forget to cancel their monthly subscriptions — and the costs add up
Could Hurricane Idalia make a return trip to Florida? Another storm did.
Convicted rapist who escaped from Arkansas prison using jet ski in 2022 is captured, authorities say