Current:Home > FinanceA federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneurs -Nova Finance Academy
A federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneurs
View
Date:2025-04-16 21:08:32
A legal battle between a program that awards grants to female entrepreneurs of color and a conservative nonprofit organization is expected to raise broader legal questions on the use of diversity programs in corporate America.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled on Saturday to temporarily block the Fearless Fund from running its Strivers Grant Contest, which awards $20,000 grants to small businesses that are led by at least one woman of color and other requirements.
The panel of judges decided 2-1 that the venture capital fund is "racially discriminatory."
The American Alliance for Equal Rights filed a racial discrimination lawsuit against the program in August, claiming it violates the Reconstruction-era Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits racial discrimination in contracts.
The Fearless Fund argues that the grants are awards and not contracts and are protected by the First Amendment.
The mission of the Fearless Fund is to bridge the gap in venture capital funding for women of color. It says that less than 1 percent of total venture capital funding raised by U.S. companies in 2018 was allocated toward businesses founded by women of color. The program also tries to help grow small businesses started by women of color.
The order pausing the Fearless Fund is another turn in what could be a long legal fight. The temporary injunction reverses a ruling by a U.S. District Court judge last week that denied the Alliance's effort to halt the program.
Conservative activist Edward Blum, founder of the American Alliance for Equal Rights, worked for years to overturn affirmative action policies in colleges and universities. Blum won a major legal victory in June when the Supreme Court effectively ended race-conscious policies in higher education.
In a statement to NPR on Monday, Blum said his organization is pleased by the court's most recent decision and hopeful for a favorable outcome.
"The members of the American Alliance for Equal Rights are gratified that the 11th Circuit has recognized the likelihood that the Fearless Strivers Grant Contest is illegal. We look forward to the final resolution of this lawsuit," Blum said.
Attorney Von Bryant, who represents the interests of venture capitalists, says the Alliance is failing to consider the many disadvantages people of color have experienced for generations in entrepreneurship.
"In the context of historically systemic racism, what the Fearless Fund grant is really trying to do is be a beacon for people who have historically and presently had an uphill battle for funding," Bryant said. "This program is trying to address that."
Bryant says an important question is at stake.
"The plaintiffs in this case are fighting for quote 'equality,' but is that equitable?" he asks.
Bryant also notes that in addition to funding, the Fearless Fund program provides valuable mentorship and networking opportunities that are disparately unavailable to Black female entrepreneurs.
The temporary injunction pauses the grants while a separate panel decides what happens next in the case.
"We strongly disagree with the decision and remain resolute in our mission and commitment to address the unacceptable disparities that exist for Black women and other women of color in the venture capital space," the Fearless Fund said in a statement to the Associated Press.
veryGood! (44)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- U.S. airman shot and killed by Florida sheriff's deputy
- 3 things we learned from Disney's latest earnings report
- Embattled Kansas City Chiefs WR Rashee Rice suspected in a nightclub assault, per reports
- Bodycam footage shows high
- High-voltage power line through Mississippi River refuge approved by federal appeals court
- Here’s why the verdict in New Hampshire’s landmark trial over youth center abuse is being disputed
- High school students, frustrated by lack of climate education, press for change
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Missouri teen's Lyft ride to shot, kill 2 siblings then flee leads to arrest: Police
Ranking
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- 15 House Democrats call on Biden to take border executive action
- How Kim Kardashian and Lana Del Rey Became Unexpected Duo While Bonding at 2024 Met Gala
- Last Minute Mother's Day Deals at Kate Spade: Score a Stylish $279 Crossbody for $63 & Free Gift
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Easily track your grocery list (and what's in your fridge) with these three apps
- With 2024 presidential contest looming, Georgia governor signs new election changes into law
- When is the 2024 NFL schedule release? Expected date comes in new report
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
'Pretty Little Liars: Summer School': Premiere date, time, cast, where to watch Season 2
Why Sarah Jessica Parker Left the 2024 Met Gala Early
Semi-automatic gun ban nixed in Colorado’s Democratic-controlled statehouse after historic progress
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
New Mexico high court upholds man’s 3 murder convictions in 2018 shooting deaths near Dixon
Katy Perry and Rihanna didn’t attend the Met Gala. But AI-generated images still fooled fans
Oprah Winfrey selects Long Island as newest book club pick