Current:Home > StocksSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Nova Finance Academy
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:15:16
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (63387)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Kelly Ripa Breaks Promise to Daughter Lola Consuelos By Calling Her Out On Live
- Americans consume a lot of red meat. Here's why you shouldn't.
- In 'Dicks: The Musical', broad jokes, narrow audience
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Confrontation led to fatal shooting at private party at Pennsylvania community center, police say
- Fantasy football rankings for Week 6: Jaguars look like a team on the rise
- National Coming Out Day: Where to find support, resources and community
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Post Malone, Dallas Cowboys team up to open Cowboys-themed Raising Cane's restaurant
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Wisconsin GOP leader reveals names of former justices he asked to look at impeachment
- DJ Moore is first Bears wide receiver since 1999 to win NFC Offensive Player of the Week
- Photographer who captured horrifying images of Challenger breaking apart after launch has died
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Olympic champion gymnast Mary Lou Retton remains in intensive care as donations pour in
- Why Jesse Palmer Definitely Thinks There Will Be a Golden Bachelorette
- NASA shows off its first asteroid samples delivered by a spacecraft
Recommendation
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Ex-convict convicted in fatal shootings of 2 California women in 2016 near Las Vegas Strip
Filed for Social Security too early? Here's why all isn't lost.
Kenya ends arrangement to swap doctors with Cuba. The deal was unpopular with Kenyan doctors
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Jada Pinkett Smith Reveals She and Will Smith Had Been Separated for 6 Years Before 2022 Oscars
Sexual assault victims suing Uber notch a legal victory in long battle
Jada Pinkett Smith Reveals She and Will Smith Had Been Separated for 6 Years Before 2022 Oscars